Should India open its arms to FDI in Retail?

The Indian government has made several attempts to pass the bill on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in retail in the past. Each time, there has been an uproar in the parliament with the opposition and its allies bringing the parliamentary sessions to a halt. Finally, it was on December 7, 2012, that the government successfully passed the bill with a few amendments while specifying that 30% of sourcing for retail has to happen domestically from the SMEs. The bill would be applicable in the 53 cities with population of more than a million. The individual state governments can decide if they want to participate or not. Although FDI in the retail sector opens a huge opportunity for India, somehow it has not convinced all the stakeholders.

Why this huge opposition and parliament logjam?

According to some sections of the society, the entry of trans-national retail chains in India will cause more than 40 million people to become unemployed. Some think that the retail chains would slowly eliminate the ‘mom and pop’ stores and establish a monopoly in trade. On the flip side, the government argues that these large retail chains would improve the supply chain infrastructure and eliminate food wastages and middlemen, which would eventually work to keep inflation under control. Undeniably, inflation has been a major cause of concern for the Indian government and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), which have been struggling hard to maintain fiscal discipline since the past 3- 4 years.

The Pros and Cons of FDI in retail in India:

The Pros:

  • Farmers are one of the biggest beneficiaries of this bill. These retail chains source directly from farmers, eliminating middlemen and paying the farmers better prices for their output.
  • These chains would take initiative in educating farmers on better agricultural practices. Currently, India is among those countries that record the lowest yields of agricultural produce in the world.
  • Studies indicate that the annual wastage of agricultural produce is around 30%. The wastage is attributed to non-availability of cold storage or processing plants. Trans-national companies with good financial muscle would invest in supply chain infrastructure that would minimize agricultural waste.
  • Consumers will benefit from better quality goods, better weights (due to world class governance and practices), better discounts and better shopping experiences.
  • The government would also benefit in terms of tax revenues. Currently, around 90% of the sector is unorganized and the cash transactions that prevail in the trade make it impossible to be transparent. This also promotes the parallel economy or the infamous “Black Market”. Some studies forecast that the government coffers may swell by around US$ 25 billion by 2020, by implementing this bill.
  • Creation of backend supply chain infrastructure and establishment of front-end stores would generate a lot of employment opportunities within the country. Researchers predict that FDI will increase the total employment within the retail sector from the current figure of  23 million to 35 million by 2021.

The Cons:

  • It is estimated that the independent mom and pop stores contribute to around 15 million points of sales. Elimination of middlemen and these smaller shops would put 20 million jobs at risk.
  • Transnational retail chains source their products from countries such as China where the cost of production is far lower compared to what businesses can offer in India.  This might impact the domestic industry in a negative way.
  • There is also a possibility that over a period of time, these large retail chains would monopolize the market and control the entire supply chain mechanism.

Conclusion:

Any change would bring in advantages to certain sections and disadvantages to the other sections of the society. The present scenario looks bright as the advantages that would benefit the larger audience outweigh the disadvantages. Middlemen may lose their source of income, but consequences witnessed by other countries such as Thailand, Indonesia, Brazil and China show that these people would be absorbed in new jobs created due to improvements in supply chain infrastructure and would be upgraded with new skills and this is definitely a desirable future. Though there could be few setbacks initially, bringing FDI into the retail sector is a welcome move and would benefit the larger sections of the society and keep inflation under check in the long run.

References:

  1. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, March 2013
  2. Business Standard, December 2012
  3. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, January 2012

2 thoughts on “Should India open its arms to FDI in Retail?

  1. unblocked games

    Nice post. I was checking continuously this weblog and I am impressed!
    Extremely helpful information specially the remaining part :)
    I take care of such info a lot. I used to be seeking this certain info for a very long
    time. Thanks and good luck.

    Reply
  2. free netflix account

    I must thank you for the efforts you have put in writing this
    site. I am hoping to check out the same high-grade content from you in
    the future as well. In fact, your creative writing abilities has inspired me to get
    my very own blog now ;)

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Anti-Spam Quiz: